England Cricket: Old Trafford Test Drama Highlights Mumbai’s Response and India’s Resolve

Published: July 29, 2025 | Last Updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction: Understanding the Old Trafford Encounter

The fourth Test between India and England at Emirates Old Trafford in Manchester, held from July 23-27, 2025, concluded as a draw following India’s extraordinary defensive performance. This match transcended typical Test cricket boundaries, generating discussion about match conduct, player entitlements, and competitive ethics that extended far beyond conventional cricket analysis.

The encounter represented a pivotal moment in the 2025 India-England Test series, with England maintaining their 2-1 series advantage but facing significant scrutiny regarding on-field conduct during the match’s final phases. India’s performance, particularly during the second innings, demonstrated technical batting resilience and mental fortitude under sustained pressure.

This comprehensive analysis examines the match’s technical dimensions, individual performances, tactical decisions, and broader implications for international cricket conduct standards. Understanding this fixture requires careful examination of both the exceptional cricket played and the conduct-related discussions that followed conclusion.

Match Information: Essential Tournament Details

Match Overview Table

Series Standing After Fourth Test

First Innings Analysis: England’s Tactical Setup

India’s First Innings Performance

India batted first following England’s successful toss decision. The team accumulated 358 runs across 114.1 overs, reflecting a defensive approach prioritizing survival and establishing a baseline total.

India’s First Innings Scorecard:

India’s innings demonstrated both technical capability and vulnerability. Yashasvi Jaiswal’s 58 provided attacking intent during the opening partnership, establishing momentum before England’s bowlers adjusted their lines and lengths. KL Rahul’s 46 contributed to a steady foundation, though both openers fell relatively early in the innings sequence.

Sai Sudharsan’s 61-run contribution showcased patient batting against disciplined bowling. His strike rate of 40.40 reflected defensive cricket prioritizing stability over aggression. Sudharsan’s approach proved valuable during middle-order consolidation phases, allowing subsequent batsmen to establish position without excessive pressure.

Rishabh Pant’s 54 off 75 balls provided the innings with aggressive momentum during a critical juncture. His strike rate of 72.00 indicated attacking intent appropriate to his batting profile. However, the middle order collapsed around him, necessitating lower-order contributions for batting point accumulation.

Shardul Thakur’s 41 from position number eight demonstrated India’s batting depth. His partnership with Washington Sundar added valuable runs during tail-end batting phases, extending the total beyond what might otherwise have been expected from lower-order contributors.

England’s Dominant Reply

England’s response proved devastating, accumulating 669 runs across 157.1 overs—an 311-run first-innings lead that positioned them strongly for potential Test victory.

England’s First Innings Scorecard:

England’s batting lineup demonstrated technical excellence across multiple dimensions. Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett provided an aggressive opening partnership, with both batsmen attacking India’s bowlers from the outset. Crawley’s 84 off 113 balls reflected positive intent, establishing psychological dominance through attacking shot selection.

Ben Duckett’s 94-run contribution proved particularly notable, as he narrowly missed completing a century by just six runs. His strike rate of 94.00 indicated aggressive approach without recklessness. The opening partnership established a strong platform for the middle order.

Joe Root’s 150-run contribution showcased his technical mastery against varied bowling attacks. His strike rate of 60.48 reflected balanced approach combining defensive responsibility with selective aggression. Root’s batting quality demonstrated why he remains among England’s most valuable batsmen across all formats.

Captain Ben Stokes’s 141 off 198 balls proved the match’s most dominant individual performance. His 11 boundaries and three sixes created an aggressive tone throughout his innings. Stokes’s batting authority established England’s commanding position and demoralized Indian bowlers facing sustained pressure.

First Innings Tactical Observations

England’s batting approach reflected their “Bazball” philosophy—aggressive, attacking cricket emphasizing positive intent and rapid scoring. The approach proved effective against Indian bowling, particularly during seam-friendly early phases when England’s openers established momentum before India’s spinners could establish control.

India’s bowling displayed variable effectiveness, with seam and spin options providing occasional breakthroughs but failing to sustain pressure on England’s established batsmen. The 311-run first-innings lead placed India in a precarious position requiring exceptional second-innings performance for survival.

India’s Extraordinary Second Innings: Survival and Controversy

Match Situation and Strategic Context

Facing a 311-run deficit, India required either substantial batting performance or a draw through defensive batting. The match situation dictated that survival represented the realistic objective, with victory appearing improbable given the deficit magnitude and remaining overs.

Day 5 weather conditions favored seam bowling, with overcast skies and variable pitch behavior creating additional pressure on Indian batsmen. However, the Australian summer approach and deteriorating pitch conditions also provided opportunities for surface conditions to become progressively easier for batting as the day progressed.

India’s Second Innings Performance

India’s second innings demonstrated remarkable defensive cricket resilience, accumulating 425 runs across 143 overs before the match concluded as a draw.

India’s Second Innings Scorecard:

India’s second innings began disastrously, with early dismissals of Yashasvi Jaiswal and KL Rahul creating a precarious 0/2 situation. However, the situation deteriorated into opportunity through subsequent batting contributions.

Shubman Gill’s Captain’s Century

Shubman Gill’s 103 off 238 balls represented leadership cricket at its highest level. His strike rate of 43.28 demonstrated defensive approach prioritizing survival over aggressive intent. Gill’s century provided psychological foundation for India’s defensive strategy, establishing that England’s bowlers could be managed through discipline and concentration.

Gill’s batting quality showcased technical excellence against disciplined bowling. His ability to leave deliveries outside off-stump with monastic discipline created space for aggressive options when deliveries warranted attacking response. His captaincy from within the crease manifested through patient accumulation and partnership building.

The Jadeja-Sundar Partnership: Match-Saving Heroics

When Rishabh Pant departed as the fourth wicket, India still required substantial batting time to secure a draw. Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar produced one of recent Test cricket’s most remarkable partnerships.

Fifth Wicket Partnership Statistics:

Ravindra Jadeja’s Defensive Masterclass

Jadeja’s unbeaten 107 off 185 balls represented Test cricket batting under maximum pressure. His strike rate of 57.84 reflected balanced approach combining defensive responsibility with selective aggression. Known primarily as a bowling all-rounder, Jadeja demonstrated batting prowess through sustained concentration and technical correctness.

His batting excellence manifested through multiple dimensions. First, occupying the crease for 185 balls required mental fortitude and concentration for extended periods. Second, his stroke selection demonstrated judgment regarding which deliveries merited attacking response versus defensive blocking. Third, his partnership management with Sundar created collective batting rhythm that frustrated England’s bowling attack.

Jadeja’s performance transcended mere run accumulation, representing instead a masterclass in Test cricket survival. Every run proved earned through concentration; every ball faced constituted small victory against England’s sustained bowling pressure.

Washington Sundar’s Maiden Century

Washington Sundar’s 101 not out off 206 balls represented career-defining achievement. His maiden Test century arrived after years of development and questioning about Test-level consistency. Sundar’s innings demonstrated stunning technical maturity and psychological resilience.

Batting for over 200 deliveries requires exceptional mental strength, particularly when carrying team survival responsibility. Sundar’s performance vindicated selectors’ faith in his development trajectory and demonstrated his capacity to deliver when team circumstances demanded exceptional contribution.

His technical approach emphasized defensive batting with selective attacking options. His strike rate of 49.03 reflected disciplined approach appropriate to match circumstances and partnership requirements. The century provided immense confidence for future Test matches and demonstrated his legitimate Test cricket credentials.

Day 5 Drama: The Handshake Incident and Controversy

Match Situation Context

With approximately 15 overs remaining in the playing day, the match outcome appeared decided as a draw. Both Jadeja and Sundar were batting in their nervous nineties—tantalizingly close to personal century milestones following their 140-plus over marathon.

The situation presented a unique juncture: the draw appeared inevitable; both batsmen approached their centuries; the match clock indicated limited remaining playing time. England’s captain Ben Stokes faced a decision regarding match management and tactical approach.

The Handshake Offer and Refusal

Stokes walked to the crease and offered a handshake to both Indian batsmen, suggesting they conclude the match as a draw and allow both teams to finish early. The gesture appeared magnanimous on surface examination—acknowledging inevitable draw conclusion and allowing early finish for player recovery and rest.

However, the situation possessed additional complexity. Both Jadeja and Sundar had fought through 140-plus overs to reach their century positions. These achievements represented career-defining milestones earned through exceptional concentration and technical excellence. The century markers retained substantial meaning and personal significance despite the match result being effectively determined.

Indian batsmen declined the handshake offer. This decision remained entirely within cricket regulations and represented reasonable judgment regarding personal achievement completion. The refusal sparked subsequent controversy regarding England’s response to the declined offer.

England’s Controversial Response: The 37 km/h Deliveries

Following India’s refusal to accept the handshake and conclude the match early, England’s captain Ben Stokes instructed part-time bowler Harry Brook to deliver subsequent balls. Brook’s deliveries reached approximately 37 kilometers per hour—substantially slower than typical pace bowling and barely faster than gentle medium-pace throws.

These deliveries prompted immediate international criticism, with widespread interpretation suggesting mockery or passive-aggressive response to India’s refusal to accept the handshake offer. Cricket commentators and analysts worldwide perceived the tactic as fundamentally disrespectful toward Indian batsmen pursuing legitimate personal achievement.

The tactical approach generated multiple critical examinations:

Regulatory Compliance: While technically within cricket regulations, the deliveries raised questions about spirit and intent within competitive frameworks.

Sportsmanship Interpretation: Critics argued that deliberately bowling at reduced pace constituted mockery rather than competitive cricket.

Player Entitlements: Debate emerged regarding whether batsmen, having invested 140-plus overs, retained rights to pursue century completion.

Captaincy Leadership: Questions arose regarding Ben Stokes’s judgment in authorizing such bowling tactics despite their regulatory compliance.

Global Cricket Community Response

Alastair Cook’s Analysis

Former England captain Alastair Cook, commentating on the match, offered measured defense of India’s position. Cook explicitly stated that Indian batsmen “were well within rights” to pursue century completion. His comment specifically referenced the “37 km/h ball,” drawing attention to what many perceived as the most indefensible tactic component.

Cook’s perspective carried significant credibility given his stature within English cricket. His defense of India’s decision indicated that mainstream England cricket opinion recognized the legitimacy of Indian batsmen pursuing established personal milestones.

Harsha Bhogle’s Articulation

Harsha Bhogle, one of cricket’s most respected analytical voices, emphasized that players completing 140-plus over batting efforts retained legitimate rights to century completion. Bhogle highlighted fundamental fairness issues regarding expectations for players to sacrifice personal achievement for opposition convenience.

His analysis transcended emotional rhetoric, focusing instead on substantive sporting ethics questions. Bhogle’s intervention shaped global public opinion regarding appropriate responses to the incident.

Gautam Gambhir’s Support

Former Indian opener and cricket administrator Gautam Gambhir offered unequivocal support for Jadeja and Sundar. Gambhir emphasized that players had earned millennium rights through extraordinary effort and concentration. His position reflected broader Indian cricket establishment perspective supporting players’ decisions.

Australian Media Perspective

Australian media outlets published particularly scathing criticism, with headlines including “Spare us the whining” and branding England’s response as “shameless.” The Australian cricket establishment, historically unrestrained in criticizing perceived unsportsmanlike conduct, viewed England’s behavior as egregious by international standards.

These criticisms proved particularly significant given Australian cricketing culture’s reputation for competitive intensity. Australian observers’ condemnation suggested England’s conduct exceeded competitive normalcy bounds.

Ravindra Jadeja’s Direct Statement

Jadeja provided the most succinct response to controversy: “It’s not on me who decides when the game is over.” This statement perfectly encapsulated the fundamental issue. Cricket regulations and umpires determine match conclusions, not captain handshake offers or reciprocal acceptance/refusal decisions.

Jadeja’s comment exposed the flawed logic underlying England’s position. By what authority could Stokes unilaterally determine match conclusion? Umpires remained available for consultation; required overs remained undelivered; formal declarations had not occurred. The statement highlighted entitled thinking implicit in England’s approach.

Tactical and Strategic Analysis

India’s Tactical Vindication

India’s decision to continue batting toward century completion proved tactically sound across multiple dimensions:

Psychological Advantage: Refusing capitulation to England’s handshake offer demonstrated mental toughness valuable for future competitive encounters and series-determining matches.

Confidence Development: Jadeja and Sundar’s centuries provided immense confidence to India’s lower-middle order, demonstrating their competitive capacity against world-class bowling attacks.

Momentum Establishment: India’s escape from apparently hopeless 311-run deficit positioned them with renewed belief entering the fifth Test, shifting series dynamics significantly.

Individual Recognition: Both batsmen earned career-defining moments with lasting professional consequences and inspirational value for future Indian cricketers.

England’s Strategic Misstep Analysis

England’s handling of the situation revealed concerning tactical elements:

Emotional Decision-Making: Stokes’s response appeared driven by frustration rather than strategic thinking, raising captaincy questions regarding emotional management under pressure.

Public Relations Consequences: The incident generated overwhelmingly negative international publicity, undermining claims to represent cricket’s “spirit” and competitive ethics.

Team Dynamics Concerns: Visible frustration suggested possible tensions within England’s camp regarding bowling performance and match management philosophy.

Series Implications: With the decisive fifth Test remaining, England’s temperament came under intense scrutiny, potentially affecting mental preparation and team cohesion heading into the finale.

The “Bazball” Philosophy Under Examination

England’s “Bazball” approach—emphasizing aggressive, attacking cricket under coach Brendon McCullum’s direction—had successfully revitalized English Test cricket through positive intent and rapid scoring. However, the Old Trafford incident exposed potential limitations:

Philosophy Application: The approach’s effectiveness when executed against compliant opposition contrasted sharply with its performance when opponents refused to conform to England’s preferred narrative.

Competitive Response: When strategic plans failed to achieve desired outcomes, England’s response appeared petulant rather than competitively mature.

Identity Crisis Questions: Debate emerged regarding whether Bazball represented genuine competitive excellence or entitled expectation that opponents accommodate England’s preferences.

Aggression Versus Petulance: Distinction emerged between aggressive, competitive cricket within regulatory frameworks versus behavior risking descent into disrespectful treatment of opponents.

Manchester Venue Analysis

Emirates Old Trafford Characteristics

Old Trafford presents specific tactical challenges reflecting Manchester’s climate and ground preparation standards. The venue traditionally features:

Early Seam Movement: Opening sessions often provide conditions favoring seam bowling and lateral movement from slight track deterioration.

Variable Weather: Manchester’s climate creates overcast conditions that enhance seam movement, particularly during morning sessions before pitch drying occurs.

Deterioration Patterns: Pitches typically develop increasing batting-friendly characteristics as matches progress, particularly during later phases.

England’s toss decision to bowl first reflected understanding of Manchester’s early-session seam assistance. However, the pitch deterioration and India’s determined batting negated anticipated seam bowling advantages.

Impact on Match Development

Manchester conditions proved less decisive than England anticipated. While early seam movement created opportunities during initial phases, India’s batting established sufficient early resistance through careful shot selection and positioning discipline. By Day 5, pitch deterioration had progressed sufficiently that seam advantages had diminished considerably.

Player Performance Evaluations

Standout Performers: Detailed Assessment

Ravindra Jadeja (Match Rating: 9.5/10)

Jadeja’s performance transcended typical all-rounder contributions, establishing himself among cricket’s premier players through exceptional batting under maximum pressure. His 107 not out off 185 balls demonstrated technical excellence, mental fortitude, and competitive maturity across all performance dimensions.

His partnership with Sundar created batting rhythm that systematically frustrated England’s attack. His selectivity regarding stroke execution and defensive positioning prevented unnecessary dismissals while maintaining partnership fluidity.

Washington Sundar (Match Rating: 9/10)

Sundar’s maiden Test century (101 not out off 206 balls) represented career-defining achievement with lasting professional significance. His batting maturity and technical correctness during a 200-ball marathon demonstrated legitimate Test cricket credentials and vindicated selector faith in his development trajectory.

Shubman Gill (Match Rating: 8/10)

Gill’s 103 off 238 balls showcased captaincy leadership combined with technical batting excellence. His strike rate of 43.28 reflected appropriate defensive approach while maintaining sufficient scoring capacity to satisfy legitimate batting responsibilities.

Joe Root (Match Rating: 7.5/10)

Root’s 150-run contribution demonstrated technical mastery despite not achieving the aggressive dominance characteristic of Ben Stokes’s performance. His balanced approach contributed significantly to England’s 669-run total.

Ben Stokes (Batting: 8/10; Captaincy: 5/10)

Stokes’s 141-run batting performance proved exceptional, featuring 11 boundaries and three sixes reflecting attacking excellence. However, his captaincy decisions during the match’s final phases, particularly regarding the handshake offer and subsequent slow bowling tactics, raised significant questions about emotional management and sporting ethics.

Series Implications and Forward Momentum

Impact on Series Trajectory

The Old Trafford draw maintained England’s 2-1 series advantage but significantly altered psychological dynamics. India’s remarkable escape generated confidence heading into the decisive fifth Test, potentially reshaping series outcome possibilities.

England’s failure to complete victory when positioned advantageously created psychological vulnerability. The controversy and public criticism regarding conduct raised additional pressure for the fifth Test, potentially affecting team focus and preparation.

Expectations for The Oval Fifth Test

The fifth Test at The Oval carried enormous significance beyond series-deciding implications. Both teams required demonstrations of character, composure, and competitive maturity following Old Trafford’s controversy.

England needed victory to secure the series 3-1, validating their approach despite controversy. India required victory to level the series 2-2, representing remarkable comeback from apparently hopeless position.

World Test Championship Implications

The draw maintained both teams’ World Test Championship qualification prospects, with England remaining positioned for strong cycle performance while India gained crucial points through draw acquisition. The drawn match awarded India 4 WTC points, incrementally improving their standings position.

Subsequent performance in series-concluding Test would significantly impact both teams’ WTC Final qualification pathways.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What was the final match result at Old Trafford between England and India?

The fourth Test concluded as a draw after India’s remarkable second-innings defensive performance. India were bowled out for 358 in their first innings, while England accumulated 669 all out, establishing a 311-run lead. In their second innings, India reached 425 for 4 wickets across 143 overs before the match concluded as a draw, with Ravindra Jadeja (107 not out) and Washington Sundar (101 not out) leading the defensive charge.

Q2: What specifically occurred during the controversial handshake incident on Day 5?

With approximately 15 overs remaining and both Jadeja and Sundar in their nervous nineties pursuing century completions, England captain Ben Stokes approached the Indian batsmen offering a handshake and suggesting match conclusion. Both batsmen declined, remaining within their rights under cricket regulations to complete personal milestones. Stokes subsequently instructed part-time bowler Harry Brook to deliver balls at approximately 37 kilometers per hour—a tactic widely interpreted as mockery and attracting substantial international criticism.

Q3: Was India’s decision to decline the handshake offer considered unsportsmanlike or controversial?

No. Cricket experts including Alastair Cook, Harsha Bhogle, and Gautam Gambhir explicitly supported India’s decision. After batting through 140-plus overs and fighting to save the Test match, both Jadeja and Sundar retained legitimate rights to complete career-defining centuries. Cricket regulations dictate when matches conclude, not premature handshake offers. The overwhelming international consensus supported India’s position.

Q4: How did cricket personalities and media respond to England’s conduct during the controversy?

International response proved overwhelmingly critical of England’s behavior. Harsha Bhogle condemned the tactics, Alastair Cook defended India’s rights, Gautam Gambhir offered unequivocal support for the Indian batsmen, and Australian media published scathing criticism with headlines like “Spare us the whining.” Only Kevin Pietersen offered somewhat sympathetic interpretation, attributing Stokes’s behavior to frustration rather than calculated disrespect.

Q5: What were the standout individual performances during this match?

England’s Joe Root (150) and Ben Stokes (141) provided dominant first-innings performances. For India, Shubman Gill’s captain’s knock of 103 in the second innings provided essential survival foundation. However, the match ultimately belonged to Ravindra Jadeja (107 not out) and Washington Sundar (101 not out), whose unbroken 203-run fifth-wicket partnership saved the Test and earned them career-defining centuries.

Q6: What tactical changes did England make following the Old Trafford controversy?

England recalled Jamie Overton and Josh Tongue to strengthen their pace bowling attack ahead of the fifth Test beginning July 31, 2025. These squad changes acknowledged that England’s bowling underperformed at Old Trafford, failing to break the crucial Jadeja-Sundar partnership despite numerous opportunities. The adjustments reflected England’s recognition that tactical refinement was necessary.

Q7: What were the broader implications of this incident for the “Bazball” philosophy and English cricket’s reputation?

The incident exposed potential limitations in England’s aggressive Bazball approach, raising questions about team responses when opponents decline to conform to England’s preferred narrative. The controversy damaged England’s reputation as guardians of cricket’s competitive spirit and raised concerns about temperament management ahead of the decisive Ashes series. Many observers suggested the incident revealed identity crisis elements within English cricket regarding the distinction between aggressive competitiveness and entitled petulance.

Q8: How did this match impact World Test Championship standings and series dynamics?

The draw awarded India 4 World Test Championship points while maintaining England’s 2-1 series advantage. However, India’s psychological momentum significantly altered series dynamics heading into the decisive fifth Test. England’s failure to complete victory despite substantial first-innings advantage created psychological vulnerability, potentially affecting team confidence and mental preparation for the series conclusion.

Conclusion: Character, Ethics, and Cricket’s Identity

The fourth Test at Emirates Old Trafford will be remembered not primarily for the quality cricket displayed, though technical excellence proved evident throughout, but rather for the controversy illuminating fundamental questions about sportsmanship and competitive ethics.

India’s magnificent second-innings escape, embodied in the unbeaten centuries of Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, deserved celebration without qualification. The batsmen’s performance demonstrated exceptional technical excellence, mental fortitude, and competitive maturity across multiple performance dimensions. Instead of pure celebration, England’s response to India’s perfectly reasonable decision to pursue established personal milestones dominated subsequent analysis and commentary.

The incident positioned cricket at a crossroads regarding interpretation of regulations versus adherence to competitive ethics. While England’s tactics technically complied with playing regulations, the spirit and intent behind the slow bowling deliveries raised legitimate questions about sportsmanship standards and respect for opponents’ legitimate achievements.

As the series moved toward The Oval for its climactic conclusion, both teams carried important lessons. India demonstrated that competitive resilience and mental fortitude could overcome apparently hopeless circumstances. England learned—or should have learned—that emotional reactions and moral grandstanding prove inferior substitutes for sustained competitive excellence and genuine opponent respect.

The controversy revealed that cricket at elite international levels transcends mere runs and wickets. The sport fundamentally concerns character under pressure, respect for opponents’ achievements, and understanding that greatest accomplishments derive from perseverance rather than premature capitulation to opposition pressure.

The Old Trafford Test established that modern cricket must navigate tensions between regulations and ethics, between aggressive competitiveness and respectful opposition treatment. Future Test cricket development will inevitably reference this incident when discussing appropriate competitive conduct standards.

The fifth Test at The Oval represented opportunity for both teams to refocus on cricket fundamentals, demonstrate character recovery following controversy, and determine through competitive excellence which team deserved series victory. The stage was set for fascinating conclusion to a compelling series where cricketing excellence, if achieved, could finally transcend the handshake controversy and restore focus to the sport itself.

About the Author

Author Name: Nueplanet

Professional Background: Nueplanet is a dedicated cricket content writer specializing in Test match analysis, international cricket competition coverage, and player performance evaluation. With commitment to accurate, data-driven reporting emphasizing analytical depth over sensationalism, Nueplanet focuses on delivering comprehensive insights into professional cricket across major international competitions.

Editorial Commitment: This article maintains strict adherence to factual accuracy and analytical neutrality. Information sources include official ICC documentation, verified match statistics from recognized cricket databases, and established cricket journalism standards. No affiliate relationships, promotional interests, or undisclosed commercial arrangements influence coverage. All tactical analysis reflects objective observation rather than subjective preference toward particular teams or players.

Verification Standards: Content undergoes verification against multiple authoritative sources including official board statements (ICC, BCCI, ECB), recognized cricket statistics databases, and established international cricket journalism outlets. When information sources conflict, discrepancies receive explicit notation rather than presenting contested claims as established fact.

Continuous Improvement: Reader feedback, verified error corrections, and evolving understanding inform ongoing content development. This article reflects information accuracy as of publication date; significant subsequent developments warrant content updates maintaining information currency.

Publication Details

Publish Date: July 29, 2025

Last Updated: July 29, 2025

Content Category: Cricket | Test Match | International Competition | Tactical Analysis

Latest Posts

• IndusInd Bank Share Price

• Avatar: Fire and Ash Trailer Breakdown

• zimbabwe Women vs Ireland Women

• Operation Mahadev

• Adani Green Share Price

Helpful Resources

• Hindustan Times – Cook, Jadeja & Sundar controversy

• Times of India – Harsha Bhogle on handshake debate

• The Guardian – Jadeja and Sundar centuries save Test

• Economic Times – Lesson from Manchester

• Reddit discussion – fan reaction to Test drama